EURL vs. BULZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EURL (Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares) and BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EURL tracks the FTSE Developed Europe Index (300%) while BULZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EURL returned 31.61%/yr vs 77.02%/yr for BULZ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EURL charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

EURL vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EURL achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 54.96% return.

EURL

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 5.44%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 6M: 19.84%
• 1Y: 36.64%
• 3Y*: 31.61%
• 5Y*: 5.43%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

BULZ

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -11.00%
• YTD: 54.96%
• 6M: 57.61%
• 1Y: 163.08%
• 3Y*: 77.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EURL vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EURL Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares	13.73%	105.85%	-11.42%	44.19%	-54.41%	-3.17%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	54.96%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EURL and BULZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021	0.58

The correlation between EURL and BULZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

EURL vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EURL	BULZ
Financial Services	23.0%	-
Industrials	19.8%	-
Healthcare	13.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	-
Technology	7.9%	62.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	12.8%
Energy	5.7%	-
Basic Materials	5.5%	-
Utilities	4.8%	-
Communication Services	3.3%	25.0%
Real Estate	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

EURL vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EURL

EURL Risk / Return Rank: 26
EURL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EURL Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
EURL Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EURL Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EURL Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EURL vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EURL	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	2.12	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	2.36	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.32	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	3.03	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.50	7.94	-4.44

EURL vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EURL Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EURL and BULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EURL vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EURL drawdown since its inception was -84.65%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EURL and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EURL	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.65%	-94.44%	+9.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.05%	-54.22%	+21.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.81%	-67.96%	+29.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.76%	-26.99%	+18.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.91%	-58.18%	+21.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.56%	20.62%	-10.06%

Volatility

EURL vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) is 17.98%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a volatility of 30.02%. This indicates that EURL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EURL	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.98%	30.02%	-12.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.51%	61.86%	-21.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.09%	77.55%	-29.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.55%	91.54%	-37.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.82%	91.54%	-35.72%

EURL vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EURL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EURL vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

EURL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EURL Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares	1.37%	1.50%	3.51%	2.50%	1.80%	0.33%	0.41%	1.17%	3.07%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EURL and BULZ in my portfolio?

EURL and BULZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EURL or BULZ?

BULZ has higher volatility (30.02%) compared to EURL (17.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EURL dropped -84.65% vs BULZ's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, EURL or BULZ?

On 3-year performance, BULZ leads with 77.02% vs 31.61% for EURL. On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EURL has been the lower-risk option at 17.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EURL or BULZ?

Over the 3-year period, BULZ has performed better with a 77.02% return vs 31.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EURL or BULZ?

BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for EURL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EURL or BULZ?

EURL has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

What is the main difference between EURL and BULZ?

EURL tracks FTSE Developed Europe Index (300%), while BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for EURL and 0.95% for BULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.