PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNN.DE vs. ICOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNN.DE vs. ICOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUNN.DE is traded in EUR, while ICOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICOP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNN.DE achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly lower than ICOP's 28.08% return.


EUNN.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.77%
YTD
16.53%
6M
16.83%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
9.05%

ICOP

1D
-0.65%
1M
8.44%
YTD
28.08%
6M
36.05%
1Y
92.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNN.DE vs. ICOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
16.53%13.46%12.90%5.64%
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
28.08%56.88%7.77%6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNN.DE and ICOP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNN.DE vs. ICOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNN.DE
EUNN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOP
ICOP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ICOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNN.DE vs. ICOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNN.DEICOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.89

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

14.87

-4.36

EUNN.DE vs. ICOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the ICOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNN.DE and ICOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNN.DEICOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.71

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.03

-0.50

Drawdowns

EUNN.DE vs. ICOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNN.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.55%, smaller than the maximum ICOP drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNN.DE and ICOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNN.DEICOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.55%

-39.21%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-24.59%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-3.65%

+3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-11.70%

+4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

6.42%

-3.56%

Volatility

EUNN.DE vs. ICOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) is 3.16%, while iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that EUNN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNN.DEICOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

12.90%

-9.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

30.46%

-15.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.97%

35.34%

-17.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

32.10%

-16.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

32.10%

-16.02%

EUNN.DE vs. ICOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNN.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOP's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNN.DE vs. ICOP - Dividend Comparison

EUNN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.


PositionTTM202520242023
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
1.64%2.08%1.87%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNN.DE and ICOP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ICOP.

EUNN.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while ICOP is Commodity Producers Equities. EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI, while ICOP tracks STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EUNN.DE and 0.47% for ICOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNN.DE and ICOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer