PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNN.DE vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNN.DE vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUNN.DE is traded in EUR, while GRID is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GRID values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNN.DE achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 19.91% return. Over the past 10 years, EUNN.DE has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 8.53%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 18.04% annualized return.


EUNN.DE

1D
-2.52%
1M
-5.18%
6M
8.06%
YTD
15.08%
1Y
32.94%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
8.53%

GRID

1D
0.14%
1M
-8.09%
6M
13.78%
YTD
19.91%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
18.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNN.DE vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
15.08%13.46%12.91%15.16%-11.48%9.24%4.12%22.22%-10.32%10.42%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
19.91%14.27%22.79%17.93%-8.55%37.20%36.57%46.02%-19.07%11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNN.DE and GRID is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.45

The correlation between EUNN.DE and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNN.DE vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNN.DE
EUNN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNN.DE vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUNN.DEGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.78

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.78

8.29

+2.49

EUNN.DE vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNN.DE and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNN.DE vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNN.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.56%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -41.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNN.DE and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNN.DEGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.56%

-41.27%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-9.82%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-24.27%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.41%

-24.27%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.56%

-41.27%

+12.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.26%

-9.70%

+3.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-7.09%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.28%

-0.37%

Volatility

EUNN.DE vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) is 6.29%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.48%. This indicates that EUNN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNN.DEGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

8.48%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.79%

17.74%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.09%

20.89%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

19.95%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

22.09%

-5.95%

EUNN.DE vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNN.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNN.DE vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

EUNN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNN.DE and GRID have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

EUNN.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EUNN.DE and 0.70% for GRID.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNN.DE and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer