EUNJ.DE vs. RQFI.DE
EUNJ.DE (iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)) and RQFI.DE (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - EUNJ.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while RQFI.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUNJ.DE returned 6.75%/yr vs 4.21%/yr for RQFI.DE. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EUNJ.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RQFI.DE.
Performance
EUNJ.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNJ.DE achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than RQFI.DE's 4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EUNJ.DE has outperformed RQFI.DE with an annualized return of 6.75%, while RQFI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.
EUNJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 6.75%
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.90%
- 10Y*
- 4.21%
EUNJ.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNJ.DE iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 12.39% | 6.55% | 11.52% | 1.84% | -1.18% | 12.55% | -3.43% | 21.23% | -6.37% | 10.31% |
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 4.69% | 11.14% | 22.23% | -16.63% | -21.95% | 7.70% | 24.38% | 37.47% | -24.90% | 16.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNJ.DE and RQFI.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2014 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNJ.DE vs. RQFI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNJ.DE
RQFI.DE
EUNJ.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUNJ.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.41 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.52 | 8.82 | -1.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUNJ.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, smaller than the maximum RQFI.DE drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNJ.DE and RQFI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNJ.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.94% | -51.79% | +14.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.13% | -9.63% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.39% | -27.47% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -41.42% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.94% | -45.24% | +8.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -16.36% | +15.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -28.18% | +21.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.64% | -0.47% |
Volatility
EUNJ.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) is 2.45%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that EUNJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQFI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNJ.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 8.37% | -5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 13.30% | -4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 17.57% | -5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 21.16% | -6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 21.90% | -5.46% |
EUNJ.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNJ.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RQFI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUNJ.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Dividend Comparison
EUNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than RQFI.DE's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNJ.DE iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.77% | 2.95% | 3.35% | 3.56% | 3.92% | 2.79% | 2.64% | 3.52% | 3.78% | 3.41% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.52% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUNJ.DE and RQFI.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNJ.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
EUNJ.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while RQFI.DE is China Equities. EUNJ.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EUNJ.DE and 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUNJ.DE and RQFI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer