EUNJ.DE vs. PAC.DE
EUNJ.DE (iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)) and PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EUNJ.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan while PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUNJ.DE returned 5.36%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for PAC.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EUNJ.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for PAC.DE.
Performance
EUNJ.DE vs. PAC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNJ.DE achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than PAC.DE's 8.00% return.
EUNJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 12.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 12.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNJ.DE vs. PAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNJ.DE iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.50% | 6.56% | 11.50% | 1.85% | -1.18% | 12.54% | -3.43% | 21.23% | -6.37% | 10.31% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNJ.DE and PAC.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.98 |
The correlation between EUNJ.DE and PAC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNJ.DE vs. PAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNJ.DE
PAC.DE
EUNJ.DE vs. PAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUNJ.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 2.00 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 5.65 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUNJ.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.08 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.41 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.43 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
EUNJ.DE vs. PAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, roughly equal to the maximum PAC.DE drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNJ.DE and PAC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNJ.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.95% | -36.90% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.13% | -6.33% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.39% | -20.21% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -20.21% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -2.33% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -5.10% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.25% | -0.12% |
Volatility
EUNJ.DE vs. PAC.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) have volatilities of 3.04% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNJ.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 3.19% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 8.91% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 11.77% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 14.54% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 16.52% | +0.02% |
EUNJ.DE vs. PAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNJ.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PAC.DE's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUNJ.DE vs. PAC.DE - Dividend Comparison
EUNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while PAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNJ.DE iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.46% | 2.95% | 3.35% | 3.56% | 3.92% | 2.79% | 2.64% | 3.52% | 3.78% | 3.41% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, EUNJ.DE and PAC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PAC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EUNJ.DE.
EUNJ.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EUNJ.DE and 0.16% for PAC.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUNJ.DE and PAC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer