PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNH.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUNH.DE is traded in EUR, while SEML.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SEML.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNH.DE achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than SEML.L's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EUNH.DE has underperformed SEML.L with an annualized return of -0.68%, while SEML.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.67% annualized return.


EUNH.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.17%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-1.68%
1Y
-1.04%
3Y*
1.61%
5Y*
-2.85%
10Y*
-0.68%

SEML.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.11%
6M
2.04%
YTD
3.52%
1Y
8.71%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
1.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNH.DE
iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
-1.68%0.80%1.52%6.83%-18.31%-3.38%4.72%6.76%0.86%-0.13%
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
3.52%4.56%3.56%7.65%-5.38%-3.59%-6.90%15.09%-1.20%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNH.DE and SEML.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011

0.18

The correlation between EUNH.DE and SEML.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNH.DE
EUNH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EUNH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SEML.L
SEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNH.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUNH.DESEML.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.27

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

2.14

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

7.19

-7.93

EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNH.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the SEML.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNH.DE and SEML.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNH.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum SEML.L drawdown of -41.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNH.DE and SEML.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNH.DESEML.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.42%

-41.37%

+18.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.59%

-3.92%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.10%

-7.68%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-10.13%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.42%

-19.93%

-2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.48%

-9.31%

-6.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-23.66%

+17.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.17%

+0.40%

Volatility

EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNH.DE) is 1.12%, while iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that EUNH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNH.DESEML.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.26%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

4.55%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.55%

5.62%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.37%

7.17%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.52%

8.64%

-3.12%

EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNH.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SEML.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNH.DE vs. SEML.L - Dividend Comparison

EUNH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than SEML.L's 5.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNH.DE
iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.31%2.30%1.77%0.97%0.27%0.24%0.47%0.65%0.66%0.70%0.94%0.62%
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
5.65%5.44%5.55%5.05%5.25%4.58%5.13%5.44%7.30%6.75%6.78%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNH.DE and SEML.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNH.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNH.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.

EUNH.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while SEML.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. EUNH.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Aggregate Treasury, while SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for EUNH.DE and 0.50% for SEML.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNH.DE and SEML.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer