PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EUNA.DE vs. RMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EUNA.DE vs. RMD

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) is Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged), while RMD (ResMed Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, EUNA.DE returned -1.28%/yr vs -2.53%/yr for RMD. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EUNA.DE vs. RMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUNA.DE is traded in EUR, while RMD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNA.DE achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly higher than RMD's -18.50% return.

EUNA.DE

1D
0.41%
1M
1.23%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
0.41%
1Y
1.44%
3Y*
2.41%
5Y*
-1.28%
10Y*
—

RMD

1D
-1.26%
1M
-4.25%
YTD
-18.50%
6M
-22.38%
1Y
-22.23%
3Y*
-5.10%
5Y*
-2.53%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNA.DE vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc		-0.20%2.91%1.48%4.41%-13.52%-2.42%3.86%5.07%-1.20%-0.20%
RMD
ResMed Inc.		-18.50%-6.35%43.04%-19.05%-14.48%32.64%26.93%40.96%42.78%-2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNA.DE and RMD is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2017

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc

ResMed Inc.

Often compared with EUNA.DE:
EUNA.DE vs. VAGF.DEEUNA.DE vs. DBZB.DEEUNA.DE vs. EUNU.DEEUNA.DE vs. XHYG.DEEUNA.DE vs. VECA.DEEUNA.DE vs. VEUA.LEUNA.DE vs. VCPA.L
Often compared with RMD:
RMD vs. DHRRMD vs. ETNRMD vs. INSPRMD vs. DXCMRMD vs. CAHRMD vs. MCKRMD vs. ^SP500TR

Return for Risk

EUNA.DE vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
RMD
RMD Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNA.DE vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EUNA.DERMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.39
-0.94

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.58
-1.22

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.85

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

-0.60

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

-1.35

+2.76

EUNA.DE vs. RMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the RMD Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNA.DE and RMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNA.DE vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, smaller than the maximum RMD drawdown of -48.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNA.DE and RMD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EUNA.DERMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-48.54%

+30.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-36.99%

+34.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.11%

-37.52%

+33.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-48.54%

+31.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-48.54%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.35%

-33.36%

+25.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-13.50%

+6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

16.54%

-15.53%

Volatility

EUNA.DE vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) is 1.22%, while ResMed Inc. (RMD) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that EUNA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EUNA.DERMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

10.09%

-8.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.95%

19.47%

-16.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

23.88%

-20.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

30.61%

-25.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.45%

31.69%

-27.24%

Dividends

EUNA.DE vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison

EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RMD
ResMed Inc.		1.25%0.94%0.88%1.07%0.83%0.62%0.73%0.98%1.26%1.61%2.03%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

EUNA.DE and RMD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNA.DE and RMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer