PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUN.L vs. XESX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUN.L achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly lower than XESX.L's 5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EUN.L has underperformed XESX.L with an annualized return of 7.22%, while XESX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.


EUN.L

1D
0.84%
1M
0.04%
YTD
5.15%
6M
7.47%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
7.22%

XESX.L

1D
0.61%
1M
1.27%
YTD
5.63%
6M
6.72%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUN.L
iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS
5.15%20.23%0.23%9.58%1.57%14.92%-3.44%16.69%-12.04%10.12%
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D
5.63%24.66%2.94%16.40%-8.32%12.93%0.07%18.58%-12.98%10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EUN.L and XESX.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2008

0.82

The correlation between EUN.L and XESX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUN.L
XESX.L

Financial Services

22.8%
26.0%

Industrials

18.1%
22.9%

Healthcare

17.4%
5.6%

Technology

10.0%
16.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
4.1%

Energy

8.1%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
10.2%

Utilities

4.5%
5.0%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.8%

Communication Services

1.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

EUN.L
22.8%
XESX.L
26.0%

Industrials

EUN.L
18.1%
XESX.L
22.9%

Healthcare

EUN.L
17.4%
XESX.L
5.6%

Technology

EUN.L
10.0%
XESX.L
16.7%

Consumer Defensive

EUN.L
9.5%
XESX.L
4.1%

Energy

EUN.L
8.1%
XESX.L
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EUN.L
4.9%
XESX.L
10.2%

Utilities

EUN.L
4.5%
XESX.L
5.0%

Basic Materials

EUN.L
3.2%
XESX.L
1.8%

Communication Services

EUN.L
1.6%
XESX.L
2.4%

Real Estate

EUN.L

-

XESX.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUN.L vs. XESX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUN.L
EUN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EUN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XESX.L
XESX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XESX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XESX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUN.LXESX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.36

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

4.41

+0.71

EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the XESX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUN.L and XESX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUN.LXESX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.03

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.49

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.48

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.16

+0.04

Drawdowns

EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.49%, roughly equal to the maximum XESX.L drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN.L and XESX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUN.LXESX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.49%

-47.16%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-11.48%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-14.20%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.31%

-23.79%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.31%

-31.68%

+5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-0.92%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-13.94%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

3.56%

-0.35%

Volatility

EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) is 4.24%, while Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that EUN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUN.LXESX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.86%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

12.29%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

15.25%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

17.47%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

18.27%

-3.44%

EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XESX.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Dividend Comparison

EUN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, which matches XESX.L's 0.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUN.L
iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D
0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.05%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EUN.L and XESX.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XESX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EUN.L.

EUN.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while XESX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUN.L and 0.09% for XESX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUN.L and XESX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer