EUN.L vs. XESX.L
EUN.L (iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS) and XESX.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D) are both Europe Equities funds - EUN.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while XESX.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUN.L returned 7.22%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for XESX.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EUN.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XESX.L.
Performance
EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUN.L achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly lower than XESX.L's 5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EUN.L has underperformed XESX.L with an annualized return of 7.22%, while XESX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.
EUN.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
XESX.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUN.L iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS | 5.15% | 20.23% | 0.23% | 9.58% | 1.57% | 14.92% | -3.44% | 16.69% | -12.04% | 10.12% |
XESX.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 5.63% | 24.66% | 2.94% | 16.40% | -8.32% | 12.93% | 0.07% | 18.58% | -12.98% | 10.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUN.L and XESX.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2008 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EUN.L and XESX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUN.L
XESX.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
EUN.L
XESX.L
Industrials
EUN.L
XESX.L
Healthcare
EUN.L
XESX.L
Technology
EUN.L
XESX.L
Consumer Defensive
EUN.L
XESX.L
Energy
EUN.L
XESX.L
Consumer Cyclical
EUN.L
XESX.L
Utilities
EUN.L
XESX.L
Basic Materials
EUN.L
XESX.L
Communication Services
EUN.L
XESX.L
Real Estate
EUN.L
-
XESX.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUN.L vs. XESX.L — Risk / Return Rank
EUN.L
XESX.L
EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUN.L | XESX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.36 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | 4.41 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUN.L | XESX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.03 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.49 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.48 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.16 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.49%, roughly equal to the maximum XESX.L drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN.L and XESX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUN.L | XESX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.49% | -47.16% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -11.48% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.31% | -14.20% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.31% | -23.79% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.31% | -31.68% | +5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -0.92% | -2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -13.94% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.56% | -0.35% |
Volatility
EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) is 4.24%, while Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that EUN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUN.L | XESX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 4.86% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 12.29% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 15.25% | -2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 17.47% | -3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 18.27% | -3.44% |
EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XESX.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUN.L vs. XESX.L - Dividend Comparison
EUN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, which matches XESX.L's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUN.L iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
XESX.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EUN.L and XESX.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XESX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XESX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EUN.L.
EUN.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while XESX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUN.L and 0.09% for XESX.L.
Find the right allocation for EUN.L and XESX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer