PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUMV.L achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than LDEU.L's 15.44% return.


EUMV.L

1D
0.41%
1M
1.12%
6M
6.04%
YTD
8.39%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
6.94%

LDEU.L

1D
0.17%
1M
0.73%
6M
12.07%
YTD
15.44%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
25.10%
5Y*
17.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EUMV.L
Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)
8.39%12.06%14.58%6.69%-13.93%15.60%
LDEU.L
L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
15.44%37.56%14.64%16.76%-3.16%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EUMV.L and LDEU.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021

0.79

The correlation between EUMV.L and LDEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUMV.L
EUMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EUMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EUMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEU.L
LDEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUMV.LLDEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.45

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

4.32

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

15.09

-11.18

EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUMV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUMV.L and LDEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUMV.L drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than LDEU.L's maximum drawdown of -20.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUMV.L and LDEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUMV.LLDEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.58%

-20.16%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.79%

-6.80%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.32%

-14.78%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.37%

-20.16%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-3.03%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.95%

+0.39%

Volatility

EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L) is 2.33%, while L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that EUMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUMV.LLDEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

2.73%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

9.36%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

11.64%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.82%

14.38%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.14%

14.24%

-2.10%

EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUMV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUMV.L vs. LDEU.L - Dividend Comparison

EUMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EUMV.L
Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDEU.L
L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.50%3.47%4.36%4.44%4.17%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUMV.L and LDEU.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EUMV.L.

EUMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LDEU.L tracks FTSE Developed Europe ex UK All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EUMV.L and 0.25% for LDEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUMV.L and LDEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer