EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L
EUMV.L (Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)) and FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EUMV.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while FLXD.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUMV.L returned 6.88%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for FLXD.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUMV.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FLXD.L.
Performance
EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EUMV.L is traded in EUR, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUMV.L achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than FLXD.L's 10.26% return.
EUMV.L
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
FLXD.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 5.51% | 12.06% | 14.58% | 6.69% | -13.94% | 23.14% | 0.82% | 18.31% | -4.96% | 3.34% |
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 10.26% | 24.64% | 13.75% | 11.55% | 0.78% | 17.74% | -4.04% | 21.03% | -12.31% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUMV.L and FLXD.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EUMV.L and FLXD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Utilities
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Industrials
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Financial Services
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Communication Services
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Real Estate
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Technology
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Energy
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Consumer Cyclical
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Healthcare
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Consumer Defensive
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Basic Materials
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank
EUMV.L
FLXD.L
EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUMV.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.37 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 5.35 | -4.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.56 | 13.92 | -12.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUMV.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.01 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.16 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.65 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUMV.L drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, smaller than the maximum FLXD.L drawdown of -34.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUMV.L and FLXD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUMV.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -34.86% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | -3.23% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.32% | -10.34% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.37% | -13.87% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -2.77% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -4.30% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 1.25% | +1.49% |
Volatility
EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison
Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.84%. This indicates that EUMV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUMV.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 2.84% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 6.85% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 8.62% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.83% | 11.20% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 13.64% | -1.27% |
EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUMV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUMV.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison
EUMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 4.37% | 4.90% | 5.18% | 5.75% | 5.87% | 5.51% | 3.90% | 1.53% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUMV.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EUMV.L.
EUMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EUMV.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.
Find the right allocation for EUMV.L and FLXD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer