PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEU.L achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly lower than X7PS.L's 17.93% return.


LDEU.L

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.93%
6M
11.68%
YTD
14.76%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
17.00%
10Y*

X7PS.L

1D
0.13%
1M
6.39%
6M
14.44%
YTD
17.93%
1Y
53.36%
3Y*
44.72%
5Y*
32.08%
10Y*
16.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LDEU.L
L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis
14.76%37.56%14.64%16.76%-3.16%9.14%
X7PS.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
17.93%78.30%33.17%25.70%0.44%15.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEU.L and X7PS.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021

0.82

The correlation between LDEU.L and X7PS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEU.L
LDEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PS.L
X7PS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDEU.LX7PS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

3.24

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.11

10.66

+4.46

LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEU.L and X7PS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEU.L drawdown since its inception was -20.16%, smaller than the maximum X7PS.L drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEU.L and X7PS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDEU.LX7PS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.16%

-60.64%

+40.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-16.49%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

-20.14%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.16%

-29.70%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.94%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-17.85%

+14.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

5.02%

-3.07%

Volatility

LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L) is 2.88%, while Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that LDEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDEU.LX7PS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

5.45%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

18.89%

-9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

22.39%

-10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

23.71%

-9.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

24.86%

-10.61%

LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDEU.L vs. X7PS.L - Dividend Comparison

LDEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while X7PS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LDEU.L
L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis
3.52%3.47%4.36%4.44%4.17%2.93%
X7PS.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDEU.L and X7PS.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for X7PS.L.

LDEU.L tracks L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis, while X7PS.L tracks Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEU.L and 0.30% for X7PS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDEU.L and X7PS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer