PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUHD.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUHD.L achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EUHD.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 9.34%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.


EUHD.L

1D
-0.96%
1M
0.20%
YTD
9.03%
6M
11.47%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
9.34%

CMU.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.55%
YTD
15.52%
6M
17.22%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
9.03%42.88%5.23%11.37%-3.26%13.30%-13.39%11.53%-7.27%13.76%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
15.52%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EUHD.L and CMU.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2016

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between EUHD.L and CMU.L has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUHD.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

35.2%
21.8%

Utilities

12.1%
5.8%

Real Estate

11.6%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
10.1%

Basic Materials

10.0%
2.8%

Energy

6.8%
0.0%

Communication Services

6.3%
2.3%

Industrials

3.8%
15.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
5.2%

Healthcare

0.0%
4.2%

Technology

-

30.8%

Financial Services

EUHD.L
35.2%
CMU.L
21.8%

Utilities

EUHD.L
12.1%
CMU.L
5.8%

Real Estate

EUHD.L
11.6%
CMU.L
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EUHD.L
10.4%
CMU.L
10.1%

Basic Materials

EUHD.L
10.0%
CMU.L
2.8%

Energy

EUHD.L
6.8%
CMU.L
0.0%

Communication Services

EUHD.L
6.3%
CMU.L
2.3%

Industrials

EUHD.L
3.8%
CMU.L
15.7%

Consumer Defensive

EUHD.L
3.7%
CMU.L
5.2%

Healthcare

EUHD.L
0.0%
CMU.L
4.2%

Technology

EUHD.L

-

CMU.L
30.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUHD.L
EUHD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUHD.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.61

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

9.79

+1.83

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUHD.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUHD.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.01

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.65

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.65

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.48

+0.14

Drawdowns

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUHD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, which is greater than CMU.L's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUHD.L and CMU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUHD.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.97%

-32.53%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-11.43%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.52%

-11.95%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-21.11%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-31.41%

-4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-0.50%

-1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-5.80%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.05%

-0.99%

Volatility

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L) is 3.81%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that EUHD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUHD.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

5.38%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

12.44%

-3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

14.87%

-3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

16.00%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

16.78%

-1.23%

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUHD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUHD.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

EUHD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
3.96%4.61%5.86%5.50%5.44%4.28%3.06%4.66%4.34%3.41%3.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUHD.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EUHD.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EUHD.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUHD.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer