EUFN vs. ICSH
EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index, while ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. EUFN is passively managed, while ICSH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUFN returned 13.48%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EUFN charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.
Performance
EUFN vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUFN achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than ICSH's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EUFN has outperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 13.48%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.
EUFN
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 28.57%
- 3Y*
- 32.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
EUFN vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 4.75% | 65.73% | 17.20% | 26.15% | -8.78% | 19.13% | -8.55% | 20.73% | -23.14% | 26.94% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.53% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUFN and ICSH is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.05 |
The correlation between EUFN and ICSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (10 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EUFN vs. ICSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUFN
ICSH
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EUFN
ICSH
-
Technology
EUFN
ICSH
-
Industrials
EUFN
ICSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
EUFN
ICSH
-
Basic Materials
EUFN
-
ICSH
-
Communication Services
EUFN
-
ICSH
-
Consumer Defensive
EUFN
-
ICSH
-
Energy
EUFN
-
ICSH
-
Healthcare
EUFN
-
ICSH
-
Real Estate
EUFN
-
ICSH
-
Utilities
EUFN
-
ICSH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUFN vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
EUFN
ICSH
EUFN vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUFN | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 6.59 | -5.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 43.88 | -42.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 290.20 | -283.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUFN vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUFN drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFN and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUFN | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.25% | -3.94% | -49.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.77% | -0.10% | -14.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -0.10% | -15.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.15% | -0.73% | -34.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.25% | -3.94% | -49.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -0.08% | -14.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 0.01% | +4.22% |
Volatility
EUFN vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.13%. This indicates that EUFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUFN | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 0.13% | +6.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 0.29% | +16.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.17% | 0.39% | +19.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 0.48% | +21.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 1.06% | +23.47% |
EUFN vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUFN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUFN vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
EUFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 3.41% | 3.57% | 5.36% | 5.00% | 4.24% | 4.15% | 1.38% | 4.55% | 6.48% | 3.04% | 4.03% | 3.65% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUFN and ICSH have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUFN has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to ICSH (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUFN dropped -53.25% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
On 10-year performance, EUFN leads with 13.48% vs 2.78% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EUFN.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 3.41% for EUFN.
EUFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EUFN and 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.98 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EUFN and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer