EUFN vs. GVAL
EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. EUFN is passively managed, while GVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUFN returned 13.48%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for GVAL. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUFN charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
EUFN vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUFN achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 16.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EUFN has outperformed GVAL with an annualized return of 13.48%, while GVAL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.46% annualized return.
EUFN
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 28.57%
- 3Y*
- 32.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
GVAL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 40.92%
- 3Y*
- 26.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
EUFN vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 4.75% | 65.73% | 17.20% | 26.15% | -8.78% | 19.13% | -8.55% | 20.73% | -23.14% | 26.94% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 16.63% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 29.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUFN and GVAL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014 | 0.75 |
The correlation between EUFN and GVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
EUFN vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUFN
GVAL
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EUFN
GVAL
Technology
EUFN
GVAL
Industrials
EUFN
GVAL
Consumer Cyclical
EUFN
GVAL
Basic Materials
EUFN
-
GVAL
Communication Services
EUFN
-
GVAL
Consumer Defensive
EUFN
-
GVAL
Energy
EUFN
-
GVAL
Healthcare
EUFN
-
GVAL
-
Real Estate
EUFN
-
GVAL
Utilities
EUFN
-
GVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUFN vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
EUFN
GVAL
EUFN vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUFN | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.47 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.48 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 13.27 | -7.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUFN vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUFN drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than GVAL's maximum drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFN and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUFN | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.25% | -46.82% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.77% | -11.50% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -15.72% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.15% | -30.83% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.25% | -46.82% | -6.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -13.85% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 3.02% | +1.21% |
Volatility
EUFN vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) at 6.00%. This indicates that EUFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUFN | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 6.00% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 13.40% | +3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.17% | 15.18% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 18.56% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 19.20% | +5.33% |
EUFN vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUFN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUFN vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
EUFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than GVAL's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 3.41% | 3.57% | 5.36% | 5.00% | 4.24% | 4.15% | 1.38% | 4.55% | 6.48% | 3.04% | 4.03% | 3.65% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.77% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUFN and GVAL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUFN has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to GVAL (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUFN dropped -53.25% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
On 10-year performance, EUFN leads with 13.48% vs 11.46% for GVAL. On fees, EUFN is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, GVAL has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUFN is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.77% for GVAL.
EUFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while GVAL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EUFN and 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EUFN and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer