PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUFN vs. FNCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUFN vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUFN achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than FNCL's -6.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EUFN having a 11.98% annualized return and FNCL not far ahead at 12.14%.


EUFN

1D
-2.03%
1M
2.59%
YTD
1.54%
6M
8.77%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
30.91%
5Y*
17.47%
10Y*
11.98%

FNCL

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-6.43%
6M
-3.99%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUFN vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
1.54%65.73%17.20%26.15%-8.78%19.13%-8.55%20.73%-23.14%26.94%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
-6.43%14.94%30.44%14.10%-12.28%34.92%-2.19%31.59%-13.44%19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EUFN and FNCL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.71

The correlation between EUFN and FNCL shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EUFN vs. FNCL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUFN
FNCL

Financial Services

97.3%
96.9%

Technology

1.1%
2.1%

Industrials

0.4%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

EUFN
97.3%
FNCL
96.9%

Technology

EUFN
1.1%
FNCL
2.1%

Industrials

EUFN
0.4%
FNCL
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EUFN
0.2%
FNCL
0.0%

Basic Materials

EUFN

-

FNCL

-

Communication Services

EUFN

-

FNCL
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

EUFN

-

FNCL

-

Energy

EUFN

-

FNCL

-

Healthcare

EUFN

-

FNCL
0.0%

Real Estate

EUFN

-

FNCL
0.7%

Utilities

EUFN

-

FNCL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUFN vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUFN
EUFN Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EUFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFN Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCL
FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUFN vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUFNFNCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.04

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

0.16

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

0.43

+5.07

EUFN vs. FNCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the FNCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUFN and FNCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUFNFNCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.16

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.41

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.55

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.53

-0.26

Drawdowns

EUFN vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUFN drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than FNCL's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFN and FNCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUFNFNCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.25%

-44.38%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-14.78%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-17.29%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.15%

-25.68%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.25%

-44.38%

-8.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-9.28%

+6.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-6.90%

-7.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

5.56%

-1.35%

Volatility

EUFN vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) at 3.26%. This indicates that EUFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUFNFNCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

3.26%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

11.03%

+5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.75%

14.76%

+4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.80%

19.26%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.55%

22.34%

+2.21%

EUFN vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUFN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUFN vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison

EUFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than FNCL's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
3.52%3.57%5.36%5.00%4.24%4.15%1.38%4.55%6.48%3.04%4.03%3.65%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
1.70%1.45%1.52%1.91%2.29%1.75%2.26%2.17%2.37%1.60%1.81%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUFN and FNCL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUFN has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to FNCL (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUFN dropped -53.25% vs FNCL's -44.38%.

On 10-year performance, FNCL leads with 12.14% vs 11.98% for EUFN. On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FNCL has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNCL has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EUFN.

EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.70% for FNCL.

EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index, while FNCL tracks MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EUFN and 0.08% for FNCL.

EUFN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUFN and FNCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer