PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EUFN vs. FLJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EUFN vs. FLJH

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) and FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index, while FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUFN returned 18.43%/yr vs 20.54%/yr for FLJH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUFN charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJH.

Performance

EUFN vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUFN achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 18.85% return.

EUFN

1D
1.20%
1M
3.43%
YTD
4.75%
6M
9.10%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
32.04%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
13.48%

FLJH

1D
0.82%
1M
1.43%
YTD
18.85%
6M
15.00%
1Y
45.89%
3Y*
25.97%
5Y*
20.54%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUFN vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF		4.75%65.73%17.20%26.15%-8.78%19.13%-8.55%20.73%-23.14%2.38%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF		18.85%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EUFN and FLJH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.54

The correlation between EUFN and FLJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUFN vs. FLJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EUFN
FLJH

Financial Services

97.1%
15.9%

Technology

1.0%
17.4%

Industrials

0.4%
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
12.8%

Basic Materials

-

4.3%

Communication Services

-

7.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.2%

Energy

-

1.0%

Healthcare

-

5.9%

Real Estate

-

3.4%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Financial Services

EUFN
97.1%
FLJH
15.9%

Technology

EUFN
1.0%
FLJH
17.4%

Industrials

EUFN
0.4%
FLJH
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EUFN
0.2%
FLJH
12.8%

Basic Materials

EUFN

-

FLJH
4.3%

Communication Services

EUFN

-

FLJH
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

EUFN

-

FLJH
4.2%

Energy

EUFN

-

FLJH
1.0%

Healthcare

EUFN

-

FLJH
5.9%

Real Estate

EUFN

-

FLJH
3.4%

Utilities

EUFN

-

FLJH
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

Often compared with EUFN:
EUFN vs. XLFEUFN vs. FDDEUFN vs. SPYEUFN vs. GSIBEUFN vs. EURLEUFN vs. IEUREUFN vs. EIRL
Often compared with FLJH:
FLJH vs. FLJPFLJH vs. EWJVFLJH vs. HEWJFLJH vs. DBJPFLJH vs. EWJFLJH vs. SCHDFLJH vs. OARK

Return for Risk

EUFN vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EUFN
EUFN Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EUFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUFN vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EUFNFLJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.31
2.46

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.92
3.35

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

4.20

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

16.28

-10.04

EUFN vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUFN and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUFN vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUFN drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFN and FLJH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EUFNFLJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.25%

-31.51%

-21.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-10.80%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-20.39%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.15%

-20.39%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.25%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.30%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-5.30%

-9.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

2.78%

+1.45%

Volatility

EUFN vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 5.20%. This indicates that EUFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EUFNFLJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

5.20%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

14.09%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

18.44%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

18.61%

+3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.53%

19.84%

+4.69%

EUFN vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUFN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUFN vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

EUFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than FLJH's 3.28% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF		3.41%3.57%5.36%5.00%4.24%4.15%1.38%4.55%6.48%3.04%4.03%3.65%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF		3.28%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EUFN and FLJH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUFN has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to FLJH (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUFN dropped -53.25% vs FLJH's -31.51%.

On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 20.54% vs 18.43% for EUFN. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 20.54% return vs 18.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EUFN.

EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 3.28% for FLJH.

EUFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while FLJH is Japan Equities. EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index, while FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EUFN and 0.09% for FLJH.

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUFN and FLJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer