PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUDV.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (EUDV.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUDV.L is traded in GBP, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDV.L achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EUDV.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 7.85%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.


EUDV.L

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
4.50%
6M
6.32%
1Y
10.80%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
7.85%

CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
8.13%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUDV.L
SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF
4.50%25.91%3.63%15.58%-5.76%7.13%-6.89%15.79%-7.00%14.97%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EUDV.L and CMU.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2012

0.83

The correlation between EUDV.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUDV.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

23.1%
21.8%

Industrials

22.4%
15.7%

Utilities

19.5%
5.8%

Basic Materials

8.8%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
5.2%

Communication Services

6.7%
2.3%

Healthcare

5.7%
4.2%

Energy

2.7%
0.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
10.1%

Technology

-

30.8%

Financial Services

EUDV.L
23.1%
CMU.L
21.8%

Industrials

EUDV.L
22.4%
CMU.L
15.7%

Utilities

EUDV.L
19.5%
CMU.L
5.8%

Basic Materials

EUDV.L
8.8%
CMU.L
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

EUDV.L
7.9%
CMU.L
5.2%

Communication Services

EUDV.L
6.7%
CMU.L
2.3%

Healthcare

EUDV.L
5.7%
CMU.L
4.2%

Energy

EUDV.L
2.7%
CMU.L
0.0%

Real Estate

EUDV.L
1.9%
CMU.L
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EUDV.L
1.3%
CMU.L
10.1%

Technology

EUDV.L

-

CMU.L
30.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUDV.L
EUDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EUDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EUDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (EUDV.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUDV.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.37

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.58

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

9.67

-5.91

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDV.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUDV.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.98

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.66

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.65

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.49

+0.07

Drawdowns

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDV.L drawdown since its inception was -31.64%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDV.L and CMU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUDV.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.64%

-32.53%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-11.43%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.82%

-11.95%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.14%

-21.11%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.64%

-31.41%

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-0.18%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-5.80%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.05%

-0.18%

Volatility

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (EUDV.L) is 2.61%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that EUDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUDV.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

5.34%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

12.44%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

14.86%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.50%

16.00%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

16.78%

-1.92%

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUDV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUDV.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

EUDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EUDV.L
SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF
3.62%4.04%3.68%3.29%3.56%2.86%3.14%3.52%3.71%3.14%2.94%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUDV.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EUDV.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EUDV.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUDV.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer