ETV vs. XLK
ETV (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, ETV returned 9.44%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for XLK. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ETV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETV achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ETV has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 9.44%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.
ETV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
ETV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETV Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 6.52% | 8.63% | 27.67% | 9.94% | -19.73% | 18.41% | 13.03% | 21.25% | -4.29% | 12.98% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETV and XLK is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2005 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ETV and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
ETV
XLK
ETV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.36 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 10.85 | -1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETV drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETV and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -82.05% | +29.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -15.92% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.27% | -25.66% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.71% | -33.56% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.39% | -33.56% | -8.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -6.77% | +5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -34.93% | +29.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 4.92% | -2.89% |
Volatility
ETV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) is 3.67%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that ETV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 10.86% | -7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 18.92% | -8.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 22.55% | -10.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 25.18% | -8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 24.64% | -5.35% |
Dividends
ETV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
ETV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETV Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 8.06% | 8.30% | 8.18% | 9.24% | 10.57% | 7.94% | 8.66% | 8.89% | 9.86% | 8.65% | 8.96% | 8.69% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETV and XLK have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to ETV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETV dropped -52.11% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETV and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer