ETV vs. ECH
ETV (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund) is a stock, while ECH (iShares MSCI Chile ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, ETV returned 9.42%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for ECH. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ETV vs. ECH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETV achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly higher than ECH's 2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ETV has outperformed ECH with an annualized return of 9.42%, while ECH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.44% annualized return.
ETV
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 21.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
ECH
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 36.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
ETV vs. ECH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETV Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 8.19% | 8.63% | 27.67% | 9.94% | -19.73% | 18.41% | 13.03% | 21.25% | -4.29% | 12.98% |
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | 2.23% | 65.41% | -8.67% | 9.01% | 25.12% | -19.80% | -7.13% | -17.79% | -18.98% | 41.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETV and ECH is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2007 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETV vs. ECH — Risk / Return Rank
ETV
ECH
ETV vs. ECH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) and iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETV | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 1.86 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 4.41 | +5.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETV vs. ECH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETV drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum ECH drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETV and ECH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETV | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -74.08% | +21.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -19.74% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.27% | -25.59% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.71% | -25.59% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.39% | -66.89% | +24.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -24.03% | +24.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -37.48% | +31.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 8.33% | -6.30% |
Volatility
ETV vs. ECH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) is 3.62%, while iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that ETV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETV | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 9.09% | -5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 21.20% | -10.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 25.51% | -13.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 27.63% | -10.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 27.27% | -7.98% |
Dividends
ETV vs. ECH - Dividend Comparison
ETV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, more than ECH's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | 1.93% | 2.01% | 3.12% | 4.77% | 6.73% | 5.49% | 2.16% | 2.47% | 2.37% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 2.13% |
ETV Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 7.99% | 8.30% | 8.18% | 9.24% | 10.57% | 7.94% | 8.66% | 8.89% | 9.86% | 8.65% | 8.96% | 8.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETV and ECH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECH has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to ETV (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETV dropped -52.11% vs ECH's -74.08%.
ETV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETV and ECH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer