ETU vs. IBIC
ETU (T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETU is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX Shares, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. ETU is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, ETU returned -78.33% vs 4.40% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. ETU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
ETU vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETU achieves a -79.49% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.37% return.
ETU
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -46.57%
- YTD
- -79.49%
- 6M
- -79.11%
- 1Y
- -78.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETU vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | -79.49% | -62.44% | 53.26% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETU and IBIC is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETU vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
ETU
IBIC
ETU vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETU | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 2.21 | -1.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 16.49 | -17.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 57.44 | -58.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETU vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETU drawdown since its inception was -95.01%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETU and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETU | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.01% | -0.90% | -94.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.91% | -0.27% | -93.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.01% | -0.14% | -94.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.39% | -0.10% | -63.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.78% | 0.08% | +65.70% |
Volatility
ETU vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) has a higher volatility of 41.10% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.19%. This indicates that ETU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETU | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.10% | 0.19% | +40.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.21% | 0.67% | +93.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.68% | 0.89% | +136.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.11% | 1.56% | +144.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.11% | 1.56% | +144.55% |
ETU vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETU vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETU and IBIC have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETU has higher volatility (41.10%) compared to IBIC (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETU dropped -95.01% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.40% vs -78.33% for ETU. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.40% return vs -78.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ETU.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.
ETU is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ETU and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.95 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETU and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer