PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETU vs. COII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETU vs. COII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) and REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETU achieves a -74.50% return, which is significantly lower than COII's -40.76% return.


ETU

1D
3.08%
1M
-32.85%
YTD
-74.50%
6M
-74.81%
1Y
-72.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COII

1D
0.00%
1M
-17.01%
YTD
-40.76%
6M
-45.71%
1Y
-61.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETU vs. COII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
-74.50%-12.91%
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
-40.76%-26.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ETU and COII is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.69

The correlation between ETU and COII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETU vs. COII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETU
ETU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

COII
COII Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
COII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETU vs. COII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) and REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETUCOIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.83

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.85

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

-1.29

+0.16

ETU vs. COII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETU Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is higher than the COII Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETU and COII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETU vs. COII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETU drawdown since its inception was -94.77%, which is greater than COII's maximum drawdown of -72.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETU and COII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETUCOIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.77%

-72.22%

-22.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.62%

-72.22%

-21.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.79%

-70.51%

-23.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.16%

-40.41%

-22.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

64.99%

47.54%

+17.45%

Volatility

ETU vs. COII - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) has a higher volatility of 40.50% compared to REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) at 17.38%. This indicates that ETU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETUCOIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.50%

17.38%

+23.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.70%

51.94%

+42.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.07%

67.57%

+70.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.29%

67.69%

+78.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.29%

67.69%

+78.60%

ETU vs. COII - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than COII's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETU vs. COII - Dividend Comparison

ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than COII's 94.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
94.11%41.52%0.00%
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.00%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETU and COII have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETU has higher volatility (40.50%) compared to COII (17.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETU dropped -94.77% vs COII's -72.22%.

On 1-year performance, COII leads with -61.18% vs -72.96% for ETU. On fees, ETU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, COII has been the lower-risk option at 17.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COII has performed better with a -61.18% return vs -72.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COII.

COII has the higher dividend yield at 94.11%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.

ETU is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while COII is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ETU and 0.99% for COII.

ETU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETU and COII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer