PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETU vs. BILZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETU vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETU achieves a -72.00% return, which is significantly lower than BILZ's 1.47% return.


ETU

1D
-2.42%
1M
-45.33%
YTD
-72.00%
6M
-76.01%
1Y
-75.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILZ

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETU vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ETU and BILZ is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETU vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETU
ETU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BILZ
BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETU vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETUBILZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-125.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

53.29

-52.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

198.46

-199.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

2,000.09

-2,001.30

ETU vs. BILZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETU Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the BILZ Sharpe Ratio of 19.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETU and BILZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETUBILZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

19.07

-19.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

10.48

-10.95

Drawdowns

ETU vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETU drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETU and BILZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETUBILZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.19%

-0.52%

-92.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.69%

-0.02%

-91.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.19%

0.00%

-93.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.47%

-0.01%

-62.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.34%

0.00%

+62.34%

Volatility

ETU vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) has a higher volatility of 20.14% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.07%. This indicates that ETU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETUBILZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.14%

0.07%

+20.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

91.27%

0.14%

+91.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

136.32%

0.21%

+136.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.77%

0.43%

+145.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.77%

0.43%

+145.34%

ETU vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETU vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison

ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than BILZ's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.07%4.19%4.95%2.23%
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.00%0.05%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETU and BILZ have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETU has higher volatility (20.14%) compared to BILZ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETU dropped -93.19% vs BILZ's -0.52%.

On 1-year performance, BILZ leads with 3.91% vs -75.56% for ETU. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BILZ has performed better with a 3.91% return vs -75.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ETU.

BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.

ETU is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ETU and 0.14% for BILZ.

BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.07 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETU and BILZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer