ETTGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
ETTGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 1996. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
ETTGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETTGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund | -5.61% | 16.69% | 25.16% | 28.24% | -20.11% | 24.69% | 23.05% | 29.32% | -5.28% | -0.33% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETTGX achieves a -5.61% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -9.81% return.
ETTGX
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -5.61%
- 6M
- -3.40%
- 1Y
- 14.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETTGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETTGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETTGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
ETTGX
SWLGX
ETTGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETTGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.83 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.17 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 4.02 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETTGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.83 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETTGX and SWLGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETTGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
ETTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than SWLGX's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund | 3.16% | 2.98% | 2.11% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.62% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.88% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ETTGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETTGX drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETTGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETTGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -32.69% | -19.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -16.16% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.03% | -32.69% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -13.03% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -7.13% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 4.69% | -1.93% |
Volatility
ETTGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) is 5.71%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that ETTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETTGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 6.73% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 12.40% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 22.57% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 21.52% | -4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 22.81% | -4.50% |