ETTGX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
ETTGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 1996. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
ETTGX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETTGX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund | -5.61% | 16.69% | 25.16% | 28.24% | -20.11% | 24.69% | 23.05% | 29.32% | -5.28% | 22.35% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -2.49% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETTGX achieves a -5.61% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ETTGX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 13.45%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.96% annualized return.
ETTGX
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -5.61%
- 6M
- -3.40%
- 1Y
- 14.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
FCGSX
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 38.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETTGX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETTGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETTGX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
ETTGX
FCGSX
ETTGX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETTGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.66 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.34 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.98 | -1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 13.43 | -7.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETTGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.66 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.63 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.95 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.88 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETTGX and FCGSX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETTGX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
ETTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than FCGSX's 10.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund | 3.16% | 2.98% | 2.11% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.62% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.88% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 10.74% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
ETTGX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETTGX drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETTGX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETTGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -38.77% | -13.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -13.10% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.03% | -38.77% | +12.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.98% | -38.77% | +5.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -6.44% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -7.05% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.91% | -0.15% |
Volatility
ETTGX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) is 5.71%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that ETTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETTGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 8.15% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 14.39% | -4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 24.14% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 23.69% | -6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 23.19% | -4.88% |