ETRL vs. QTAP
ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
ETRL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.22% return.
ETRL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 21.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ETRL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 1.78% | -51.32% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 13.22% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETRL and QTAP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETRL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
ETRL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP
ETRL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETRL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 48.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETRL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETRL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.63% | -29.44% | -47.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.45% | -1.36% | -49.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.88% | -4.99% | -42.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.45% | — |
Volatility
ETRL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETRL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.42% | 6.05% | +96.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 18.92% | +83.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 18.70% | +83.72% |
ETRL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETRL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETRL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETRL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.
ETRL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for ETRL and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer