ETRL vs. NEMG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.

Performance

ETRL vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's 0.49% return.

ETRL

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 6M: -33.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEMG

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -3.03%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 6M: 19.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETRL vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF	5.50%	-20.28%
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	0.49%	27.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ETRL and NEMG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.13

Return for Risk

ETRL vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETRL	NEMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.55	0.59	-1.15

Drawdowns

ETRL vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.44%, which is greater than NEMG's maximum drawdown of -51.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and NEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETRL	NEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.44%	-51.18%	-25.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.21%	-41.20%	-7.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.50%	-20.86%	-26.64%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETRL	NEMG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	105.70%	99.99%	+5.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	105.70%	99.99%	+5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	105.70%	99.99%	+5.71%

ETRL vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETRL vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETRL nor NEMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETRL and NEMG in my portfolio?

ETRL and NEMG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETRL or NEMG?

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETRL or NEMG?

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETRL or NEMG?

ETRL and NEMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETRL and NEMG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 0.75% for NEMG.