ETRL vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ETRL is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

ETRL vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ETRL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.92%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: -2.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: 31.07%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETRL vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	14.65%

Return for Risk

ETRL vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

ETRL vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETRL	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.63%	-26.63%	-50.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.45%	-3.84%	-46.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.88%	-11.62%	-36.26%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETRL	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.42%	307.99%	-205.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.42%	307.99%	-205.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.42%	307.99%	-205.57%

ETRL vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETRL vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

ETRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.

Position	TTM
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ETRL or MUU?

On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETRL or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETRL or MUU?

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for ETRL.

What is the main difference between ETRL and MUU?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 1.01% for MUU.