ETRL vs. MUU
ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.
Performance
ETRL vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 798.37% return.
ETRL
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- -33.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -15.35%
- 1M
- 121.05%
- YTD
- 798.37%
- 6M
- 1,279.44%
- 1Y
- 5,396.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETRL vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 5.50% | -50.91% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 798.37% | 391.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETRL and MUU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETRL vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
ETRL
MUU
ETRL vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETRL | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 41.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 5.91 | -6.46 |
Drawdowns
ETRL vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.44%, roughly equal to the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETRL | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.44% | -75.07% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.21% | -15.35% | -32.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -23.42% | -24.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.54% | — |
Volatility
ETRL vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETRL | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 56.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 106.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.70% | 132.77% | -27.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.70% | 134.14% | -28.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.70% | 134.14% | -28.44% |
ETRL vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETRL vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
ETRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.54% | 4.27% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETRL and MUU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.
MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for ETRL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 1.06% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for ETRL and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer