ETRL vs. LULG
ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.
Performance
ETRL vs. LULG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than LULG's -75.54% return.
ETRL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LULG
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -25.41%
- YTD
- -75.54%
- 6M
- -76.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETRL vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 1.78% | -3.90% |
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -75.54% | 55.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETRL and LULG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETRL vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETRL vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, roughly equal to the maximum LULG drawdown of -79.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and LULG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETRL | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.63% | -79.88% | +3.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.45% | -77.35% | +26.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.88% | -37.21% | -10.67% |
Volatility
ETRL vs. LULG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETRL | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.42% | 88.29% | +14.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 88.29% | +14.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 88.29% | +14.13% |
ETRL vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETRL vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETRL nor LULG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETRL and LULG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.
ETRL and LULG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 0.75% for LULG.
Find the right allocation for ETRL and LULG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer