PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETRL vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETRL vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -56.09% return.


ETRL

1D
2.41%
1M
0.47%
YTD
5.50%
6M
-33.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRMG

1D
-1.95%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-56.09%
6M
-50.25%
1Y
-60.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETRL vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ETRL and CRMG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETRL vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETRL

CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETRL vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ETRL vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETRLCRMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.55

-0.65

+0.10

Drawdowns

ETRL vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.44%, roughly equal to the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETRLCRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.44%

-74.38%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.21%

-67.87%

+19.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-37.81%

-9.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.08%

Volatility

ETRL vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETRLCRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

105.70%

75.31%

+30.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.70%

75.62%

+30.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.70%

75.62%

+30.08%

ETRL vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETRL vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETRL nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETRL and CRMG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.

ETRL and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 0.75% for CRMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETRL and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer