ETRL vs. AMDG
ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.
Performance
ETRL vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 357.64% return.
ETRL
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- -33.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDG
- 1D
- -6.80%
- 1M
- 102.23%
- YTD
- 357.64%
- 6M
- 342.85%
- 1Y
- 1,059.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETRL vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 5.50% | -50.91% |
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 357.64% | 46.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETRL and AMDG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETRL vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank
ETRL
AMDG
ETRL vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETRL | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 8.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 3.14 | -3.69 |
Drawdowns
ETRL vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.44%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and AMDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETRL | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.44% | -63.04% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.21% | -6.80% | -41.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -25.64% | -21.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.80% | — |
Volatility
ETRL vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETRL | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 46.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 95.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.70% | 129.86% | -24.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.70% | 130.24% | -24.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.70% | 130.24% | -24.54% |
ETRL vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETRL vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison
ETRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 2.45% | 11.21% |
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETRL and AMDG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.
AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.00% for ETRL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 0.75% for AMDG.
Find the right allocation for ETRL and AMDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer