PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETOHX vs. EHSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETOHX vs. EHSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund (ETOHX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETOHX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than EHSTX's 12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, ETOHX has underperformed EHSTX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while EHSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.


ETOHX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.27%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.12%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
1.91%

EHSTX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
12.37%
6M
11.21%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
11.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETOHX vs. EHSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETOHX
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund
1.70%4.00%1.45%4.85%-8.30%0.94%5.43%8.09%0.88%4.54%
EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
12.37%12.11%11.25%7.93%-2.80%24.25%2.29%30.84%-6.96%14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ETOHX and EHSTX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 1993

-0.01

The correlation between ETOHX and EHSTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (10 years) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETOHX vs. EHSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETOHX
ETOHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ETOHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETOHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETOHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ETOHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETOHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

EHSTX
EHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETOHX vs. EHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund (ETOHX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETOHXEHSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.33

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.58

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

10.37

-2.58

ETOHX vs. EHSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETOHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the EHSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETOHX and EHSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETOHX vs. EHSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETOHX drawdown since its inception was -21.71%, smaller than the maximum EHSTX drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETOHX and EHSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETOHXEHSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.71%

-53.47%

+31.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-8.29%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.34%

-16.44%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.00%

-16.44%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.00%

-39.30%

+26.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.38%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-7.40%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

2.06%

-1.24%

Volatility

ETOHX vs. EHSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund (ETOHX) is 0.76%, while Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that ETOHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETOHXEHSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

4.23%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.12%

8.88%

-6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70%

11.61%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.89%

14.77%

-10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.19%

17.27%

-13.08%

ETOHX vs. EHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETOHX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than EHSTX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETOHX vs. EHSTX - Dividend Comparison

ETOHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than EHSTX's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
5.39%6.12%4.03%2.93%4.25%7.32%1.94%2.76%10.94%5.88%1.33%11.02%
ETOHX
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund
3.44%4.24%3.62%2.42%2.81%2.56%2.77%3.40%3.11%3.42%3.58%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETOHX and EHSTX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EHSTX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to ETOHX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETOHX dropped -21.71% vs EHSTX's -53.47%.

ETOHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETOHX and EHSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer