ETO vs. VMVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX).
ETO is a passively managed fund by Eaton Vance that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Apr 30, 2004. VMVFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
ETO vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETO vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETO Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund | -8.20% | 29.96% | 15.55% | 21.54% | -29.96% | 37.18% | 6.25% | 50.98% | -19.19% | 33.57% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 2.85% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETO achieves a -8.20% return, which is significantly lower than VMVFX's 2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ETO has outperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.
ETO
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -8.74%
- YTD
- -8.20%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 19.48%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
VMVFX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETO vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETO has a 2.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETO vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank
ETO
VMVFX
ETO vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETO | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.93 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 6.16 | -0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETO | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.93 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.94 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.73 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.79 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETO and VMVFX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ETO vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison
ETO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, less than VMVFX's 9.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETO Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund | 7.60% | 6.85% | 7.81% | 6.97% | 9.87% | 5.82% | 7.36% | 8.32% | 11.51% | 8.50% | 9.51% | 9.29% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.70% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
ETO vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETO drawdown since its inception was -72.02%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETO and VMVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETO | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.02% | -33.09% | -38.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.27% | -7.96% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.44% | -13.02% | -22.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.03% | -33.09% | -18.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.73% | -4.98% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -2.84% | -9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.66% | +1.90% |
Volatility
ETO vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.93%. This indicates that ETO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETO | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 2.93% | +4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 4.99% | +6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 10.06% | +9.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 10.76% | +9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 12.49% | +10.22% |