ETO vs. PGVFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETO (Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund) and PGVFX (Polaris Global Value Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ETO returned 12.40%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for PGVFX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETO charges 2.56%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PGVFX.

Performance

ETO vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETO achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 19.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ETO has outperformed PGVFX with an annualized return of 12.40%, while PGVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.

ETO

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 6M: 9.07%
• 1Y: 27.08%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: 12.40%

PGVFX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 19.53%
• 6M: 22.73%
• 1Y: 38.21%
• 3Y*: 21.58%
• 5Y*: 9.45%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETO vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETO Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund	4.31%	29.96%	15.55%	21.54%	-29.96%	37.18%	6.25%	50.98%	-19.19%	33.57%
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund	19.53%	27.01%	5.33%	14.76%	-12.00%	15.38%	6.65%	22.83%	-12.64%	20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ETO and PGVFX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2004	0.66

The correlation between ETO and PGVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ETO vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETO

ETO Risk / Return Rank: 36
ETO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ETO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
ETO Omega Ratio Rank: 41
ETO Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ETO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

PGVFX

PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 90
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETO vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETO	PGVFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	3.32	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	4.65	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.63	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	4.45	-2.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.97	16.11	-8.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETO vs. PGVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETO Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the PGVFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETO and PGVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETO	PGVFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	3.32	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.69	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.69	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.49	-0.04

Drawdowns

ETO vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETO drawdown since its inception was -72.02%, which is greater than PGVFX's maximum drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETO and PGVFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETO	PGVFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.02%	-68.09%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.27%	-8.76%	-6.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.24%	-12.53%	-5.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.44%	-27.58%	-7.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.03%	-41.26%	-10.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-0.09%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.74%	-11.30%	-1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	2.42%	+0.99%

Volatility

ETO vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) have volatilities of 4.18% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETO	PGVFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	4.09%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.28%	9.55%	+2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	11.76%	+3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.04%	13.80%	+6.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.74%	15.87%	+6.87%

ETO vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETO has a 2.56% expense ratio, which is higher than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETO vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison

ETO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than PGVFX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETO Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund	6.77%	6.85%	7.81%	6.97%	9.87%	5.82%	7.36%	8.32%	11.51%	8.50%	9.51%	9.29%
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund	4.33%	5.17%	5.65%	1.68%	3.55%	4.05%	1.55%	3.69%	3.39%	1.50%	1.32%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETO and PGVFX in my portfolio?

ETO and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETO or PGVFX?

ETO has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to PGVFX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETO dropped -72.02% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.