PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETN vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETN vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETN achieves a 28.62% return, which is significantly higher than TFLO's 2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ETN has outperformed TFLO with an annualized return of 23.17%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.


ETN

1D
0.36%
1M
4.06%
6M
26.25%
YTD
28.62%
1Y
14.24%
3Y*
27.77%
5Y*
23.49%
10Y*
23.17%

TFLO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.88%
YTD
2.00%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
2.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETN vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
28.62%-2.79%39.51%56.22%-7.18%46.70%29.88%42.76%-10.04%21.54%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.00%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%0.43%2.04%1.76%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ETN and TFLO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETN vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETN
ETN Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ETN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ETN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETN Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETN vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETNTFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-46.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

12.40

-11.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

200.45

-199.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

770.50

-768.81

ETN vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETN Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 13.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETN and TFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETN vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETN drawdown since its inception was -68.95%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETN and TFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETNTFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.95%

-5.01%

-63.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.14%

-0.02%

-19.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.46%

-0.04%

-34.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

-0.13%

-34.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.55%

-0.16%

-44.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.54%

0.00%

-6.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-0.10%

-14.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.01%

0.01%

+9.00%

Volatility

ETN vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a higher volatility of 16.71% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.11%. This indicates that ETN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETNTFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.71%

0.11%

+16.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.80%

0.21%

+28.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.54%

0.29%

+35.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.77%

0.36%

+30.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.23%

0.45%

+29.78%

Dividends

ETN vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than TFLO's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.05%1.31%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%1.88%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.84%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETN and TFLO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETN has higher volatility (16.71%) compared to TFLO (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETN dropped -68.95% vs TFLO's -5.01%.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.69 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETN and TFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer