ETMGX vs. FAMRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ETMGX (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund) and FAMRX (Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund) are both mutual funds - ETMGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FAMRX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, ETMGX returned 8.11%/yr vs 11.26%/yr for FAMRX. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ETMGX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FAMRX.

Performance

ETMGX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETMGX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than FAMRX's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ETMGX has underperformed FAMRX with an annualized return of 8.11%, while FAMRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.

ETMGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.43%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 8.51%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: 2.27%
• 10Y*: 8.11%
• ALL TIME*: 9.26%

FAMRX

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: 8.36%
• YTD: 12.22%
• 1Y: 24.35%
• 3Y*: 16.41%
• 5Y*: 9.01%
• 10Y*: 11.26%
• ALL TIME*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETMGX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ETMGX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETMGX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund	8.51%	-6.63%	11.43%	11.06%	-16.53%	20.91%	12.33%	27.32%	-5.86%	15.26%
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund	12.22%	20.87%	12.60%	18.98%	-18.55%	17.10%	19.37%	26.26%	-9.21%	21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ETMGX and FAMRX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between ETMGX and FAMRX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ETMGX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETMGX

ETMGX Risk / Return Rank: 8
ETMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
ETMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ETMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
ETMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ETMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FAMRX

FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETMGX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETMGX	FAMRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	1.64	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	2.30	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.30	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	2.41	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.81	10.18	-9.38

ETMGX vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETMGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETMGX and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETMGX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETMGX drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETMGX and FAMRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETMGX	FAMRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.02%	-58.65%	+21.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.14%	-9.33%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.28%	-15.35%	-6.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.14%	-26.00%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.02%	-30.96%	-6.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.99%	-1.82%	-5.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.60%	-12.26%	+5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.90%	2.21%	+3.69%

Volatility

ETMGX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) at 3.95%. This indicates that ETMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETMGX	FAMRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	3.95%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.44%	11.56%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.43%	13.69%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.75%	14.86%	+3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.90%	15.29%	+4.61%

ETMGX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETMGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETMGX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

ETMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than FAMRX's 4.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETMGX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund	6.49%	7.04%	2.85%	1.36%	2.80%	8.28%	0.09%	6.50%	7.75%	11.87%	6.00%	5.50%
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund	4.95%	5.56%	3.44%	1.33%	5.07%	3.15%	1.99%	5.52%	5.62%	2.31%	0.28%	4.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETMGX and FAMRX in my portfolio?

ETMGX and FAMRX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETMGX or FAMRX?

ETMGX has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to FAMRX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETMGX dropped -37.02% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.