PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLX.DE achieves a -17.69% return, which is significantly lower than CSH.PA's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ETLX.DE has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 11.24%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.68% annualized return.


ETLX.DE

1D
-1.41%
1M
-14.44%
6M
-25.07%
YTD
-17.69%
1Y
45.65%
3Y*
37.92%
5Y*
22.00%
10Y*
11.24%

CSH.PA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
6M
1.04%
YTD
1.05%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
0.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETLX.DE
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-17.69%152.51%27.45%11.01%-7.07%-3.33%12.25%42.55%-5.79%-3.18%
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
1.05%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.11%-0.70%-0.69%-0.61%-0.55%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLX.DE and CSH.PA is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2009

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLX.DE
ETLX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ETLX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETLX.DECSH.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.86

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

5.77

-4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

34.47

-31.54

ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLX.DE and CSH.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.44%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLX.DE and CSH.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLX.DECSH.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.44%

-5.07%

-68.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.57%

-0.35%

-36.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.57%

-0.35%

-36.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.01%

-0.75%

-41.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.06%

-3.57%

-43.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.57%

-0.32%

-36.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-1.51%

-32.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.71%

0.06%

+15.65%

Volatility

ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison

L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 0.53%. This indicates that ETLX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLX.DECSH.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.74%

0.53%

+13.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.76%

0.65%

+37.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.26%

0.71%

+47.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.80%

0.42%

+36.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.09%

0.32%

+33.77%

ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLX.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETLX.DE vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLX.DE nor CSH.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLX.DE and CSH.PA have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ETLX.DE.

ETLX.DE is categorized as Gold, while CSH.PA is Money Market. ETLX.DE tracks DAXglobal® Gold Miners, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ETLX.DE and 0.10% for CSH.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLX.DE and CSH.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer