PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE) and L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ETLR.DE

1D
-0.30%
1M
5.92%
YTD
15.36%
6M
15.53%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*

BATG.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ETLR.DE
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF
15.36%12.36%14.84%16.06%1.96%
BATG.DE
L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%5.88%12.80%12.76%1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLR.DE and BATG.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022

0.72

The correlation between ETLR.DE and BATG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLR.DE
ETLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ETLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

BATG.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE) and L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETLR.DEBATG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETLR.DEBATG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

Drawdowns

ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLR.DEBATG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

Volatility

ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLR.DEBATG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLR.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ETLR.DE vs. BATG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLR.DE nor BATG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLR.DE and BATG.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETLR.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for BATG.DE.

ETLR.DE tracks Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap, while BATG.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETLR.DE and 0.16% for BATG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLR.DE and BATG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer