PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLK.DE achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than XNKY.DE's 30.76% return.


ETLK.DE

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.04%
6M
8.14%
YTD
11.56%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*

XNKY.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.82%
6M
22.85%
YTD
30.76%
1Y
56.07%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ETLK.DE
L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF
11.56%7.48%11.53%1.31%-0.52%11.62%9.20%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
30.76%16.16%14.34%18.03%-15.35%3.16%7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLK.DE and XNKY.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020

0.59

The correlation between ETLK.DE and XNKY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLK.DE
ETLK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ETLK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XNKY.DE
XNKY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETLK.DEXNKY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

4.34

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

12.34

-5.62

ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLK.DE and XNKY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLK.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, which is greater than XNKY.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLK.DE and XNKY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLK.DEXNKY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.68%

-21.47%

-15.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-12.99%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-20.16%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.91%

-21.15%

+1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-9.49%

+8.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-7.80%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

4.56%

-2.29%

Volatility

ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE) is 2.66%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that ETLK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNKY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLK.DEXNKY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

9.09%

-6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

20.87%

-11.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

25.87%

-13.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

19.15%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.12%

18.79%

-0.67%

ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLK.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XNKY.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ETLK.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLK.DE nor XNKY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLK.DE and XNKY.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for ETLK.DE.

ETLK.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XNKY.DE is Japan Equities. ETLK.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Pacific ex Japan Large & Mid Cap, while XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETLK.DE and 0.09% for XNKY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLK.DE and XNKY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer