ETJ vs. NXG
ETJ (Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund) and NXG (NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund) are both Global Equity Income funds. Over the past 3 years, ETJ returned 10.99%/yr vs 35.48%/yr for NXG. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETJ charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for NXG.
Performance
ETJ vs. NXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETJ achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than NXG's 25.55% return.
ETJ
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
NXG
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 25.55%
- 6M
- 25.58%
- 1Y
- 40.65%
- 3Y*
- 35.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETJ vs. NXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund | -0.73% | 3.49% | 29.55% | 14.15% | -8.32% |
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 25.55% | 25.98% | 51.16% | 4.54% | -5.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETJ and NXG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2022 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETJ vs. NXG — Risk / Return Rank
ETJ
NXG
ETJ vs. NXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETJ | NXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.38 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 3.10 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 8.52 | -7.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETJ | NXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 2.14 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 1.01 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
ETJ vs. NXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETJ drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, which is greater than NXG's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETJ and NXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETJ | NXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.81% | -26.14% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -13.19% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.44% | -26.14% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | 0.00% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -6.59% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 4.78% | -2.17% |
Volatility
ETJ vs. NXG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) is 2.97%, while NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that ETJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETJ | NXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 5.85% | -2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 14.07% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 19.12% | -7.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 26.87% | -11.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 26.87% | -8.91% |
ETJ vs. NXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETJ has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NXG's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETJ vs. NXG - Dividend Comparison
ETJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.27%, less than NXG's 10.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund | 9.27% | 8.86% | 8.16% | 8.86% | 11.68% | 8.53% | 8.79% | 9.77% | 11.23% | 9.82% | 12.46% | 10.98% |
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 10.74% | 12.83% | 14.15% | 12.00% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETJ and NXG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXG has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to ETJ (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETJ dropped -32.81% vs NXG's -26.14%.
NXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETJ and NXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer