PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETJ vs. ESIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETJ vs. ESIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETJ achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than ESIIX's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ETJ has outperformed ESIIX with an annualized return of 8.17%, while ESIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return.


ETJ

1D
-0.59%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
8.17%

ESIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.83%
1Y
9.72%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
5.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETJ vs. ESIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETJ
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
-0.73%3.49%29.55%14.15%-22.74%11.92%22.31%26.78%-7.03%18.93%
ESIIX
Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I
2.18%12.46%6.66%8.52%-2.32%1.59%7.80%7.65%-2.44%5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ETJ and ESIIX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2009

0.21

The correlation between ETJ and ESIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETJ vs. ESIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETJ
ETJ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETJ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETJ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIIX
ESIIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ESIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETJ vs. ESIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETJESIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.83

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

4.21

-3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

16.19

-14.69

ETJ vs. ESIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the ESIIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETJ and ESIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETJESIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

3.61

-3.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

1.68

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

1.65

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.46

-0.17

Drawdowns

ETJ vs. ESIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETJ drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, which is greater than ESIIX's maximum drawdown of -26.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETJ and ESIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETJESIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.81%

-26.87%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-2.44%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.44%

-2.46%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.55%

-6.18%

-22.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.81%

-12.25%

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-0.55%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-4.72%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

0.63%

+1.98%

Volatility

ETJ vs. ESIIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX) at 1.04%. This indicates that ETJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETJESIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.04%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

2.22%

+6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

2.84%

+8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

3.19%

+12.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

3.17%

+14.79%

ETJ vs. ESIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETJ has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIIX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETJ vs. ESIIX - Dividend Comparison

ETJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.27%, more than ESIIX's 7.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESIIX
Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I
7.39%7.01%7.23%7.19%5.82%4.57%4.44%5.29%4.25%3.95%4.18%4.59%
ETJ
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
9.27%8.86%8.16%8.86%11.68%8.53%8.79%9.77%11.23%9.82%12.46%10.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETJ and ESIIX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETJ has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to ESIIX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETJ dropped -32.81% vs ESIIX's -26.87%.

ESIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETJ and ESIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer