PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETILX vs. TAAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETILX vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide Gilead Class I (ETILX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETILX achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than TAAGX's 37.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ETILX has underperformed TAAGX with an annualized return of 13.80%, while TAAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.


ETILX

1D
-0.46%
1M
8.22%
YTD
13.33%
6M
11.73%
1Y
33.69%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
13.80%

TAAGX

1D
0.42%
1M
6.70%
YTD
37.12%
6M
34.03%
1Y
62.50%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*
16.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETILX vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETILX
Eventide Gilead Class I
13.33%23.77%-0.03%22.76%-34.03%11.44%55.44%34.11%-2.35%33.09%
TAAGX
Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund
37.12%16.01%36.81%26.46%-25.98%17.90%36.11%27.71%-12.17%19.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ETILX and TAAGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010

0.88

The correlation between ETILX and TAAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETILX vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETILX
ETILX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ETILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETILX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ETILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETILX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

TAAGX
TAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETILX vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Gilead Class I (ETILX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETILXTAAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.49

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

6.86

-4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

27.38

-17.99

ETILX vs. TAAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the TAAGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETILX and TAAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETILXTAAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

3.03

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.78

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.74

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.28

+0.31

Drawdowns

ETILX vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETILX drawdown since its inception was -41.30%, smaller than the maximum TAAGX drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETILX and TAAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETILXTAAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.30%

-62.13%

+20.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.40%

-9.26%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.71%

-29.24%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.30%

-34.47%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.30%

-34.47%

-6.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-18.69%

+7.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

2.31%

+1.30%

Volatility

ETILX vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eventide Gilead Class I (ETILX) is 5.16%, while Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that ETILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETILXTAAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

6.86%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

16.88%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.73%

20.97%

-3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.22%

23.36%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.43%

22.30%

+1.13%

ETILX vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETILX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETILX vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison

ETILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.65%, more than TAAGX's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETILX
Eventide Gilead Class I
10.65%12.07%1.25%0.00%5.36%6.30%0.79%3.14%5.31%0.00%0.00%1.13%
TAAGX
Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund
2.51%3.44%17.62%3.12%3.06%8.89%5.75%0.00%7.57%0.00%0.00%15.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETILX and TAAGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAAGX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to ETILX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETILX dropped -41.30% vs TAAGX's -62.13%.

TAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETILX and TAAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer