PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETIHX vs. FACDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETIHX vs. FACDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund (ETIHX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETIHX achieves a -7.42% return, which is significantly lower than FACDX's -5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ETIHX has outperformed FACDX with an annualized return of 11.77%, while FACDX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.


ETIHX

1D
-5.63%
1M
-9.22%
YTD
-7.42%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
47.54%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
11.77%

FACDX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
-6.28%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETIHX vs. FACDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETIHX
Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund
-7.42%56.73%-10.13%11.01%-19.62%-16.87%37.12%58.74%-0.27%45.83%
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
-5.18%14.19%3.97%3.81%-13.07%11.25%21.07%27.89%7.20%24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ETIHX and FACDX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.79

The correlation between ETIHX and FACDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETIHX vs. FACDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETIHX
ETIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ETIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ETIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FACDX
FACDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FACDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FACDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETIHX vs. FACDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund (ETIHX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETIHXFACDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

0.92

+1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

1.45

+1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.16

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.09

+2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.94

2.96

+9.98

ETIHX vs. FACDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the FACDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETIHX and FACDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETIHXFACDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

0.92

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.10

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.43

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.56

-0.06

Drawdowns

ETIHX vs. FACDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETIHX drawdown since its inception was -55.11%, which is greater than FACDX's maximum drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETIHX and FACDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETIHXFACDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.11%

-44.55%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-13.43%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.23%

-17.49%

-15.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.27%

-29.35%

-19.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.11%

-29.35%

-25.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.84%

-9.14%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.99%

-9.35%

-8.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

4.93%

-1.24%

Volatility

ETIHX vs. FACDX - Volatility Comparison

Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund (ETIHX) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) at 5.08%. This indicates that ETIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FACDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETIHXFACDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

5.08%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.88%

12.11%

+6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.96%

15.85%

+8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.85%

17.90%

+9.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

18.78%

+9.62%

ETIHX vs. FACDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETIHX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FACDX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETIHX vs. FACDX - Dividend Comparison

ETIHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FACDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETIHX
Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.78%3.49%2.08%7.33%1.28%0.00%1.22%
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
14.01%13.28%12.33%0.00%0.00%6.24%5.94%0.32%5.08%0.00%0.00%6.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETIHX and FACDX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETIHX has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to FACDX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETIHX dropped -55.11% vs FACDX's -44.55%.

ETIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETIHX and FACDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer