PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Documentation

ETHX-B.TO (CI Galaxy Ethereum ETF) and CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHX-B.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CI, while CINF.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETHX-B.TO returned 0.97%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for CINF.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Ethereum ETF (ETHX-B.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHX-B.TO achieves a -35.45% return, which is significantly lower than CINF.TO's 17.05% return.

ETHX-B.TO

1D
-2.40%
1M
4.83%
6M
-42.35%
YTD
-35.45%
1Y
-43.36%
3Y*
1.24%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
—

CINF.TO

1D
-0.52%
1M
-0.38%
6M
13.71%
YTD
17.05%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ETHX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Ethereum ETF		-35.45%-15.87%55.80%90.02%-65.68%64.85%
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool		17.05%12.54%16.53%5.27%5.03%10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHX-B.TO and CINF.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2021

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Galaxy Ethereum ETF

CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool

Often compared with ETHX-B.TO:
ETHX-B.TO vs. ETHX-U.TOETHX-B.TO vs. SOLL.TOETHX-B.TO vs. BTCC.TOETHX-B.TO vs. ETHY.TOETHX-B.TO vs. FBTC.TOETHX-B.TO vs. BTCX-B.TOETHX-B.TO vs. CBCX.TO
Often compared with CINF.TO:
CINF.TO vs. UTIL.TOCINF.TO vs. CMNY.TOCINF.TO vs. EHE.TOCINF.TO vs. HUTL.TOCINF.TO vs. XUT.TOCINF.TO vs. VXM-B.TOCINF.TO vs. ZUT.TO

Return for Risk

ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ETHX-B.TO
ETHX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETHX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
CINF.TO
CINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Ethereum ETF (ETHX-B.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ETHX-B.TOCINF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.66
2.27

-2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.75
3.11

-3.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.41

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

4.09

-4.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.99

12.09

-13.08

ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHX-B.TO and CINF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.38%, which is greater than CINF.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHX-B.TO and CINF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ETHX-B.TOCINF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.38%

-12.27%

-66.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.14%

-5.31%

-61.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.14%

-9.62%

-57.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.38%

-12.27%

-66.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.76%

-1.07%

-59.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-2.05%

-41.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.75%

1.79%

+41.96%

Volatility

ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Galaxy Ethereum ETF (ETHX-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.91% compared to CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) at 2.03%. This indicates that ETHX-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ETHX-B.TOCINF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.91%

2.03%

+11.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.47%

7.75%

+37.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.64%

9.56%

+57.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.86%

11.96%

+56.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.73%

12.07%

+59.66%

Dividends

ETHX-B.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison

ETHX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool		2.42%2.80%3.06%3.45%3.51%3.56%2.27%
ETHX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Ethereum ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ETHX-B.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHX-B.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CINF.TO is Utilities Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHX-B.TO and CINF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer