ETHW vs. USO
ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHW is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. ETHW is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHW returned -31.71% vs 101.55% for USO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. ETHW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
ETHW vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHW achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.
ETHW
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.65%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.65%
- 1Y
- -31.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
ETHW vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -39.45% | -11.26% | -3.54% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -8.46% | -1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHW and USO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHW vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
ETHW
USO
ETHW vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHW | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | 2.31 | -2.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | 2.89 | -3.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.38 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 5.01 | -5.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 9.42 | -10.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHW | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 2.31 | -2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -0.18 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
ETHW vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHW | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.04% | -98.19% | +34.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.87% | -20.39% | -42.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -85.01% | +22.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -75.30% | +42.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.74% | 10.82% | +26.92% |
Volatility
ETHW vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) is 10.08%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that ETHW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHW | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 14.87% | -4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.02% | 38.23% | +7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.33% | 44.20% | +24.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 36.06% | +36.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 39.00% | +33.13% |
ETHW vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHW vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHW nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHW and USO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to ETHW (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHW dropped -64.04% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 1-year performance, USO leads with 101.55% vs -31.71% for ETHW. On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHW has been the lower-risk option at 10.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USO has performed better with a 101.55% return vs -31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
ETHW and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ETHW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHW and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer