ETHW vs. IMRA
ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) and IMRA (Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHW is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while IMRA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ETHW returned -31.71% vs -32.66% for IMRA. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for IMRA.
Performance
ETHW vs. IMRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHW achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than IMRA's 30.26% return.
ETHW
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.65%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.65%
- 1Y
- -31.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMRA
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 30.26%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- -32.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHW vs. IMRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -39.45% | 66.56% |
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.26% | -33.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHW and IMRA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.61 |
The correlation between ETHW and IMRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHW vs. IMRA — Risk / Return Rank
ETHW
IMRA
ETHW vs. IMRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHW | IMRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | -0.55 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | -0.51 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.94 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.53 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.86 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHW | IMRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | -0.55 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -0.19 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
ETHW vs. IMRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, roughly equal to the maximum IMRA drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and IMRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHW | IMRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.04% | -61.55% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.87% | -61.55% | -1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -40.71% | -22.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -28.21% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.74% | 37.93% | -0.19% |
Volatility
ETHW vs. IMRA - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) at 9.53%. This indicates that ETHW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHW | IMRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 9.53% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.02% | 43.61% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.33% | 59.89% | +8.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 61.39% | +10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 61.39% | +10.74% |
ETHW vs. IMRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IMRA's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHW vs. IMRA - Dividend Comparison
ETHW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 108.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 108.66% | 188.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHW and IMRA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHW has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to IMRA (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHW dropped -64.04% vs IMRA's -61.55%.
On 1-year performance, ETHW leads with -31.71% vs -32.66% for IMRA. On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IMRA has been the lower-risk option at 9.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHW has performed better with a -31.71% return vs -32.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for IMRA.
IMRA has the higher dividend yield at 108.66%, compared with 0.00% for ETHW.
ETHW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IMRA is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.98% for IMRA.
ETHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHW and IMRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer