PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHW vs. CBXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHW vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHW achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than CBXO's -3.67% return.


ETHW

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.65%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.65%
1Y
-31.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBXO

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-3.67%
6M
-5.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHW vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ETHW and CBXO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHW vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHW
ETHW Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHW Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CBXO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHW vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHWCBXODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

ETHW vs. CBXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHWCBXODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

-2.36

+1.94

Drawdowns

ETHW vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and CBXO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHWCBXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.04%

-11.40%

-52.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.87%

-11.40%

-51.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.65%

-8.46%

-24.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.74%

Volatility

ETHW vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHWCBXODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.33%

7.23%

+61.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.13%

7.23%

+64.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.13%

7.23%

+64.90%

ETHW vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHW vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison

ETHW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ETHW and CBXO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.

CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for ETHW.

ETHW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.69% for CBXO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHW and CBXO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer