ETHW vs. BFJL
ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) and BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHW is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). ETHW is actively managed, while BFJL is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHW returned -46.96% vs -14.80% for BFJL. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ETHW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFJL.
Performance
ETHW vs. BFJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHW achieves a -37.28% return, which is significantly lower than BFJL's -5.11% return.
ETHW
- 1D
- -3.05%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- 6M
- -30.30%
- YTD
- -37.28%
- 1Y
- -46.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.96%
BFJL
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 1Y
- -14.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.56K | $8.09K | $4.95K | |
| $14.26M | $11.82M | $10.86M |
ETHW vs. BFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -37.28% | 17.77% |
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | -5.11% | -7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHW and BFJL is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ETHW and BFJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHW vs. BFJL — Risk / Return Rank
ETHW
BFJL
ETHW vs. BFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHW | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.81 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.74 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | -1.00 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHW vs. BFJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -67.89%, which is greater than BFJL's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and BFJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHW | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.89% | -21.27% | -46.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.89% | -21.27% | -46.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.55% | -19.01% | -42.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.20% | -12.90% | -22.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.37% | 15.74% | +29.63% |
Volatility
ETHW vs. BFJL - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) at 3.65%. This indicates that ETHW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHW | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 3.65% | +9.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.97% | 5.54% | +40.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.15% | 13.20% | +53.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.13% | 13.17% | +57.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.13% | 13.17% | +57.96% |
ETHW vs. BFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BFJL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHW vs. BFJL - Dividend Comparison
ETHW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.42% | 1.35% |
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHW and BFJL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHW has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to BFJL (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHW dropped -67.89% vs BFJL's -21.27%.
On 1-year performance, BFJL leads with -14.80% vs -46.96% for ETHW. On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BFJL has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BFJL has performed better with a -14.80% return vs -46.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.
BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for ETHW.
ETHW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFJL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.90% for BFJL.
ETHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHW and BFJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer