ETHV vs. WNTR
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. ETHV is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -46.88% vs 106.92% for WNTR. Their -0.72 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
ETHV vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -37.18% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.51% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 9.95%
- 6M
- -19.62%
- YTD
- -37.18%
- 1Y
- -46.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.99%
WNTR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 106.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $515.18K | $688.78K | $1.40M | |
| $3.92M | $3.66M | $3.95M |
ETHV vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -37.18% | 48.31% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.51% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and WNTR is -0.75, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.72 |
The correlation between ETHV and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
WNTR
ETHV vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHV | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.30 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 2.52 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 6.38 | -7.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -42.65% | -25.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.88% | -42.65% | -25.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.49% | -9.84% | -51.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.33% | -20.15% | -15.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.53% | 16.83% | +28.70% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) is 12.12%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 13.00%. This indicates that ETHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.12% | 13.00% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.60% | 47.22% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.95% | 54.66% | +12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.17% | 53.34% | +17.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.17% | 53.34% | +17.83% |
ETHV vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHV vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.26% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHV and WNTR have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WNTR has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to ETHV (12.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -67.88% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 106.92% vs -46.88% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 12.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 106.92% return vs -46.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.26%, compared with 0.00% for ETHV.
ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer