ETHV vs. NFXS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. ETHV is passively managed, while NFXS is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -35.21% vs 69.91% for NFXS. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

ETHV vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -46.75% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 26.00% return.

ETHV

• 1D: -4.62%
• 1M: -23.36%
• YTD: -46.75%
• 6M: -46.15%
• 1Y: -35.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFXS

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: 23.02%
• YTD: 26.00%
• 6M: 25.81%
• 1Y: 69.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHV vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF	-46.75%	-11.02%	40.65%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	26.00%	-8.56%	-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHV and NFXS is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.19

Return for Risk

ETHV vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHV

ETHV Risk / Return Rank: 5
ETHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ETHV Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ETHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ETHV Martin Ratio Rank: 5

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 63
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHV vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHV	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	2.08	-2.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.41	2.72	-3.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.39	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	2.24	-2.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.87	6.13	-7.00

ETHV vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHV Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHV and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHV vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -67.54%, which is greater than NFXS's maximum drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHV	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.54%	-50.37%	-17.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.54%	-31.31%	-36.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.36%	-11.63%	-55.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.79%	-31.89%	-1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.63%	11.44%	+29.19%

Volatility

ETHV vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) has a higher volatility of 19.89% compared to Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) at 7.76%. This indicates that ETHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHV	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.89%	7.76%	+12.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.41%	26.25%	+20.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.10%	33.78%	+35.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.41%	34.63%	+37.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.41%	34.63%	+37.78%

ETHV vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHV vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	2.81%	3.53%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHV and NFXS in my portfolio?

ETHV and NFXS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHV or NFXS?

ETHV has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to NFXS (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -67.54% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, ETHV or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 69.91% vs -35.21% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHV or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 69.91% return vs -35.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHV or NFXS?

ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHV or NFXS?

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for ETHV.

What is the main difference between ETHV and NFXS?

ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.