ETHV vs. BFOC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. ETHV is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.

Performance

ETHV vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.39% return.

ETHV

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -25.17%
• YTD: -40.24%
• 6M: -43.60%
• 1Y: -32.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFOC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: -7.39%
• 6M: -9.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHV vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF	-40.24%	-31.61%
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	-7.39%	-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHV and BFOC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

ETHV vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHV

ETHV Risk / Return Rank: 5
ETHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ETHV Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ETHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ETHV Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHV vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHV	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHV	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	-1.87	+1.45

Drawdowns

ETHV vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and BFOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHV	BFOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.02%	-18.20%	-45.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.36%	-18.20%	-45.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.71%	-12.55%	-20.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETHV	BFOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.34%	12.57%	+55.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.23%	12.57%	+59.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.23%	12.57%	+59.66%

ETHV vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHV vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHV nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHV and BFOC in my portfolio?

ETHV and BFOC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETHV or BFOC?

On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHV or BFOC?

ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHV or BFOC?

ETHV and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETHV and BFOC?

ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.90% for BFOC.